| Helmuth Sørensen Nyborg | |
|---|---|
| Born | 5 January 1937 |
| Citizenship | Danish |
| Fields | Developmental psychology |
| Institutions | Aarhus University |
| Known for | Kayaking career, Heritability of IQ, Sex and intelligence |
Helmuth Sørensen Nyborg (born 5 January 1937) is a former professor of developmental psychology at Aarhus University, Denmark. He is one of the most cited Danish psychologists.[1] His main research topic is the connection between hormones and intelligence. Among other things, he has worked on increasing the intelligence of girls with Turner's syndrome by giving them estrogen. His research has been widely criticized, and in 2007, after having been accused of scientific misconduct, he received a warning from Aarhus University for producing research of unacceptably low quality. In 2007 he retired.[2][3] Nyborg's case is frequently cited as an example of how political correctness impedes science.[4]
|
Nyborg is a controversial figure among the Danish public for his research on topics such as the inheritance of intelligence and the relationship between sex and intelligence. His article in Personality and Individual Differences (PAID), in which he reports a 5-point average IQ difference in favour of men,[5] has led to strong reactions in the Danish public and academia, for example in an editorial by the Danish newspaper Politiken. [6] A recent article proposing that migration from third world countries to Denmark would cause a dysgenic effect on the country's average IQ over time, has led to Nyborg being indicted to the Danish Council for Scientific Misconduct a second time, accused of committing scientific fraud by using statistic models of population growth known to be erroneous and for not properly attributing the source of the model.[7][8][9]
Nyborg has also made controversial statements regarding religious beliefs and ethnicity in relation to intelligence. He has argued that white people tend to be more intelligent than blacks and that atheists tend to be more intelligent than religious people.[10]
| Olympic medal record | ||
|---|---|---|
| Men's canoe sprint | ||
| Bronze | 1960 Rome | K-1 4 x 500 m |
Nyborg competed as a sprint canoer in the early 1960s. He won a bronze medal for Denmark in the K-1 4 x 500 m event at the 1960 Summer Olympics in Rome.[11][12]
Even though his paper Sex-related differences in general intelligence g, brain size, and social status[5] had passed peer review in an expert scientific journal, Aarhus University assembled a committee to investigate accusations of scientific malfeasance and fraud, consisting of educational scientist Jan-Eric Gustafsson (Gothenburg), statistician Jens Ledet Jensen (Aarhus), and biostatistician Niels Keiding (Copenhagen). The report concludes that the work exhibits some lack of diligence from Nyborg's side, and that there were errors in Nyborg's work, but that the single, indisputable technical mistake does not allow any conclusions. The committee found no evidence of fraud. The report explicitly does not enter into a discussion of the correctness of Nyborg's research or the methodology of using the general intelligence factor.[13] Svend Hylleberg, the dean of the social science faculty of Aarhus University, reacted to the report by suspending Nyborg in 2006.
Hylleberg's decision led to strong reactions from international researchers, writing to the dean to protest against what they perceive as a witch-hunt.[14] Among the defenders of Nyborg's work are intelligence researchers J. Philippe Rushton and Linda Gottfredson who themselves have been at the centre of media attention. However, experts from other fields have also rallied to Nyborg's side. According to Fred M. Feinberg (University of Michigan), who works in econometrics and has followed Nyborg's work, the level of statistical rigour in Nyborg's research is well ahead of most in the field. He adds that he would be surprised if an investigation into the life's work of equally productive researchers would fail to find mistakes similar to or more serious than the inaccuracies in Nyborg's work, and that Nyborg's mistakes are unintentional, with few substantive consequences for his conclusions. A number of other researchers [15] made broadly similar points, among them many prominent methodologists.
The reported male–female IQ difference in Nyborg's work is about 8 points. According to Rushton, his own research points to an IQ difference of 3.63, and the committees' analysis of Nyborg's data would imply a difference 4.55.[16]
On 21 September 2006, the university gave Nyborg a "severe reprimand", revoked his suspension, and declared the case closed.[17][18] After Nyborg's retirement in 2007 his severe reprimand was changed to a "warning" because of the unacceptable standard of the scientific research.[19]